Skip to main content

The Joy of the Lord: Choosing Goodness in a World of Suffering

“Choose joy.”

You have seen it. It is on coffee mugs, throw pillows, and at least one wooden sign in every farmhouse-style kitchen in America. Depending on when you hear it, it is either good advice or the two most irritating words in the English language.
Said by someone who has been through real hardship and come out the other side still grateful, it can sound like wisdom. Said to someone standing at a graveside, three weeks into a depression, or the day after a layoff, it can sound more like, “Could you please be sad somewhere else?”
So here is the question: Is joy something Christians actually choose? Or is “choose joy” just a polite way of telling hurting people to get over it?
Neither answer quite works. Scripture does call believers to rejoice. It even commands it. But Scripture also describes joy as something God gives, and it makes a surprising amount of room for grief, lament, anger, and the honest recognition that the world is badly broken. If we are going to say anything useful about joy, we have to hold all of that together.

Start with the verse on the sign

“The joy of the LORD is your strength” is probably the most quoted joy verse in the Bible. It is also one of the verses most often removed from its setting.
In Nehemiah 8, the people of Israel have returned from exile, and Jerusalem’s wall has been rebuilt. Ezra reads the Law publicly from early morning until midday. As the people hear and understand it, they begin to weep (Nehemiah 8:3, 9). They are confronted with God’s instruction and, presumably, with how far they and their ancestors have fallen short.
Nehemiah, Ezra, and the Levites tell them not to mourn on that particular day because it is holy to the Lord. They are to eat rich food, drink sweet wine, and send portions to anyone who has nothing prepared. Then comes the familiar line: “Do not be grieved, for the joy of the LORD is your strength” (Nehemiah 8:9–10).
At first glance, that sounds suspiciously like the sort of thing we have already agreed can be obnoxious. A leader sees people crying and tells them to stop crying.
But the passage is not dismissing their grief as meaningless. It is directing them to recognize the kind of day it is. This is a day set apart for worship, celebration, and shared provision. The people have heard God’s Law, understood it, and are being called to respond not only with conviction but also with worship and generosity.
The joy in the passage is not private happiness. It includes sending food to people who do not have any. That matters. Biblical joy is not simply an internal feeling that leaves everyone else alone. It has practical consequences.
The Hebrew word translated “strength” can also carry the sense of a stronghold or refuge. That is a better picture than treating joy like spiritual caffeine. The joy of the Lord is not an energy drink. It is a place of refuge.
Interpreters debate whether “the joy of the LORD” means joy found in God or God’s joy over His people. The wording allows discussion. But the main point does not depend on settling every detail: this joy is rooted in God, not in the people’s ability to force themselves into a better mood.
Already, then, Nehemiah 8 gives us three important ideas. Joy requires wisdom about the moment. Joy rests in God rather than in our emotional condition. And joy overflows into generosity.

Can you command a feeling?

Paul tells the Thessalonians to “rejoice always” and to “give thanks in all circumstances” (1 Thessalonians 5:16–18). He tells the Philippians, “Rejoice in the Lord always; again I will say, rejoice” (Philippians 4:4). Deuteronomy commands Israel to rejoice in its feasts, and later warns against failing to serve God with joy and gladness (Deuteronomy 16:14–15; 28:47).
But how do you command a feeling? I cannot command you to find something funny. Believe me, I have tried. Every semester.
The better answer is that biblical commands involving emotion are not usually switches we flip. They are directions in which we walk. The command to rejoice does not mean, “Feel cheerful immediately, or else.” It means, “Turn your life toward the God, practices, and promises in which joy is cultivated.”
Paul makes that clearer in Philippians 4. He tells believers to rejoice “in the Lord,” then says, “The Lord is at hand” (Philippians 4:4–5). That phrase may emphasize the Lord’s nearness to His people or His soon-coming return. Either way, joy is grounded in God’s presence and faithfulness, not in pleasant circumstances.
Paul then tells them to bring their anxieties to God in prayer, with thanksgiving. He says that God’s peace will guard their hearts and minds. Only after that does he tell them to think about whatever is true, honorable, just, pure, lovely, and worthy of praise (Philippians 4:6–8).
Notice the first word on the list: true. Not pleasant. Not convenient. Not whatever makes you feel better for five minutes. True.
Paul is not proposing a positive-thinking program in which Christians stare at the bright side while ignoring everything else. Some true things are terrible. He is telling believers not to let terrible things become the only true things they ever see.
The wording in 1 Thessalonians matters too. Paul says to give thanks in all circumstances. He does not say every circumstance is itself good or that Christians must be thankful for cancer, betrayal, abuse, or death. Gratitude in suffering means that suffering has not erased every gift, every act of love, every evidence of grace, or every reason for hope.

Contentment is learned

Paul says, “I have learned in whatever situation I am to be content” (Philippians 4:11). Learned. Then he says he has “learned the secret” of facing abundance and need, plenty and hunger (Philippians 4:12).
Contentment was not installed at Paul’s conversion like factory software. He learned it through hardship, deprivation, conflict, imprisonment, and danger (see 2 Corinthians 11:23–27). That is encouraging for those of us who are not there yet. It means we may not be defective. We may simply be in the middle of learning.
The next verse is often pulled out for athletic competitions and motivational posters: “I can do all things through him who strengthens me” (Philippians 4:13). In context, Paul is not claiming that Christ will help him accomplish every ambition. He is saying that Christ strengthens him to remain faithful in hunger and abundance alike.
James makes a related point. He tells believers to “count it all joy” when they encounter trials because the testing of faith produces steadfastness, which leads toward maturity (James 1:2–4). James is not asking anyone to call suffering pleasant. He is asking believers to evaluate it in light of what God can produce through it.
As someone who works in valuation, I appreciate the language. A trial is a real cost. James does not deny that. But he says the cost may produce endurance, and endurance may produce maturity. That does not make the trial good in itself. It does mean the trial is not necessarily meaningless.
And this is the same James who condemns wealthy landowners for defrauding workers of their wages (James 5:1–6). So “count it joy” cannot mean “accept injustice with a smile.” James holds both truths: suffering can produce endurance, and evil should still be confronted.
There is, then, a real element of choice. We cannot always choose our circumstances, and we cannot always choose our first emotional response. But we can often choose, slowly and imperfectly, where we direct our attention, what story we tell about our suffering, and what we do next.
Modern research supports that point, though it needs to be stated modestly. In an early experiment, participants assigned to list things for which they were grateful reported better well-being than comparison groups focused on hassles or neutral events. Emmons and McCullough’s study was useful, but it did not prove that gratitude is a cure for suffering. A later meta-analysis of 27 studies found small reductions in depression and anxiety symptoms from gratitude interventions. Small is not nothing, but it is also not a substitute for appropriate care. Cregg and Cheavens’s meta-analysis is a helpful corrective to both cynicism and magical thinking.

Comparison is very good at ruining joy

If attention matters, comparison is one of the fastest ways to direct it in the wrong direction.
At the end of John’s Gospel, Jesus tells Peter something deeply personal about his future. Peter immediately turns around, sees John, and asks, “Lord, what about this man?” Jesus responds, “What is that to you? You follow me” (John 21:18–22).
Peter has just received perhaps the most personal word of his life, and within moments he is checking whether John got a better deal. We do the same thing. We just have better technology for it. We compare careers, houses, children, health, churches, vacations, and apparently everyone else’s ability to look rested in photographs. Then we wonder why gratitude feels difficult.
Psalm 73 gives us one of the Bible’s most honest accounts of envy. Asaph admits that he was envious when he saw the prosperity of arrogant and wicked people (Psalm 73:3). Their lives appeared easy, healthy, and secure, and it nearly wrecked his faith. What changes? “Until I went into the sanctuary of God; then I discerned their end” (Psalm 73:17).
His circumstances did not change. His vantage point did. By the end of the psalm, he can say, “Whom have I in heaven but you? And there is nothing on earth that I desire besides you” (Psalm 73:25).
Paul tells believers to examine their own work rather than measuring themselves against others (Galatians 6:4–5). James warns that jealousy and selfish ambition produce disorder and destructive behavior (James 3:16). That is the problem with envy. It never asks whether something is good. It asks only whether someone else has more of it.
Even spiritual success cannot bear the weight of our identity. When the seventy-two disciples return excited that demons submit to them, Jesus tells them not to make that their deepest source of joy. Their enduring joy is that their names are written in heaven (Luke 10:17–20). Results change. Belonging to God does not.

But suffering is not merely a perspective problem

Once we say joy involves perspective, it is a short slide toward assuming that suffering is mainly a perspective problem. Scripture will not let us go there.
Joy is a fruit of the Spirit (Galatians 5:22–23). Fruit grows. You do not assemble it. Paul also prays that the God of hope would fill believers with joy and peace (Romans 15:13). Joy is not simply the product of willpower, better habits, or sufficiently aggressive gratitude journaling.
So is joy God’s gift or our responsibility? Scripture says both, without making it easy for us. Paul tells believers to work out their salvation because God is at work in them, giving them both the desire and the ability to do His will (Philippians 2:12–13). The verse is about salvation more broadly, but it captures an important pattern: God works, and His people respond.
Think of a gardener. You cannot make a tomato. But you can water, weed, and keep the deer away. Christian traditions explain the relationship between God’s work and human responsibility in different ways. But none of them teach that joy is purely self-made, and none of them teach that we simply sit around waiting for it.
The Bible also makes substantial room for grief. Ecclesiastes says there is “a time to weep, and a time to laugh; a time to mourn, and a time to dance” (Ecclesiastes 3:4). It even says that the house of mourning can teach what the house of feasting cannot (Ecclesiastes 7:2).
Lament is a major part of the Psalms. Psalm 88 ends in darkness without a tidy resolution. Apparently, the Bible was not afraid of a sad ending. Yet Psalm 88 still begins by addressing “O LORD, God of my salvation.” Honest complaint directed toward God is still an act of faith.
Psalm 42 shows what faith can look like in the middle of grief. The writer asks, “Why are you cast down, O my soul?” and then tells himself, “Hope in God” (Psalm 42:5). But the refrain returns later in the psalm. The struggle is not resolved after one speech to himself. That is not failure. It is realism.
Jesus gives the clearest example. On His way to Lazarus’s tomb, knowing He will raise Lazarus, He still weeps (John 11:33–35). The language describing His response may also suggest indignation. He grieves, and He confronts the reality of death. In Gethsemane, He says, “My soul is very sorrowful, even to death” (Matthew 26:38). He weeps over Jerusalem, then enters the temple and confronts corruption there (Luke 19:41–46). Grief does not prevent action. It can become part of what drives it.
Christians are therefore told to weep with those who weep, bear one another’s burdens, and comfort others with the comfort they have received from God (Romans 12:15; Galatians 6:2; 2 Corinthians 1:3–4). Proverbs says that singing songs to a heavy heart is like vinegar on soda (Proverbs 25:20). If you ever performed that experiment in a middle-school science class, you know it is not a calming image.
Job’s friends begin well. They sit silently with him for seven days (Job 2:11–13). Then they begin explaining why he must be suffering, and everything deteriorates from there. Their central error was not insufficient cheerfulness. It was presuming to interpret Job’s pain for him. God later rebukes them for speaking wrongly about Him, though He also confronts Job in the closing chapters (Job 42:7; 38–41). Honest lament receives a better hearing in the book of Job than tidy explanations for another person’s suffering.
That matters for people dealing with depression, anxiety, trauma, grief, or serious illness. They may need encouragement, but they may also need practical help, patient friends, a pastor, a doctor, a counselor, or all of the above. In the same chapter where Paul says, “Rejoice always,” he also says, “Encourage the fainthearted, help the weak, be patient with them all” (1 Thessalonians 5:14). He expected people to have different amounts of strength.
Scripture also refuses to reduce evil to an attitude problem. God calls His people to seek justice, defend the vulnerable, and care for people in need (Isaiah 1:17; Micah 6:8; James 2:15–17). If someone lacks food or clothing, James does not recommend a better perspective. He asks what good pious words are without material help. James would have had some thoughts about the throw pillow.

Sorrow and joy can occupy the same life

The strongest biblical picture is not joy instead of grief. It is joy alongside grief.
Paul describes himself as “sorrowful, yet always rejoicing” (2 Corinthians 6:10). Peter writes of believers who rejoice even while being grieved by various trials (1 Peter 1:6). Paul tells the Thessalonians not to grieve as those who have no hope. He does not say not to grieve at all (1 Thessalonians 4:13).
Christian hope is not the vague assumption that things usually work out. Sometimes they plainly do not. Christian hope is resurrection and new creation. It is the confidence that death is not final and that God will ultimately wipe away every tear (1 Thessalonians 4:14; Revelation 21:4).
Hebrews says that Jesus endured the cross “for the joy that was set before him” (Hebrews 12:2). The verse does not make suffering pleasant. It points beyond suffering to the joy and vindication that lie ahead. In John 16, Jesus compares the disciples’ coming sorrow to a woman in labor. The pain is real, but it is going somewhere. Their sorrow will be turned to joy, and no one will take that joy from them (John 16:20–22).
Habakkuk offers perhaps the clearest example. Facing national disaster, he imagines the failure of crops, herds, and food supplies. Then he says, “Yet I will rejoice in the LORD; I will take joy in the God of my salvation” (Habakkuk 3:17–18).
He does not pretend the harvest is fine. He describes the disaster in detail. Then he says, “Yet.”
The Christian life may fit inside that one word.

Joy is something we bring into the room

Joy is something believers receive and cultivate. But it does not remain private.
In Acts 16, Paul and Silas are beaten, imprisoned, and placed in stocks. At midnight they are praying and singing hymns, and Luke adds a striking detail: “the prisoners were listening to them” (Acts 16:25). Then an earthquake opens the prison, and the jailer, believing the prisoners have escaped, prepares to kill himself. Paul stops him. Before the night is over, the jailer is tending their wounds, feeding them, and rejoicing with his household (Acts 16:27–34).
Joy that began in a dark prison cell ended at a stranger’s dinner table.
Paul describes the Macedonian churches as experiencing severe affliction and extreme poverty, yet overflowing in generous giving (2 Corinthians 8:2). That is not math I would teach in a finance class, but it is how the kingdom works. Even Israel’s feast joy included servants, foreigners, orphans, and widows (Deuteronomy 16:11, 14). Biblical joy was never meant to be a party of one.
The film Life Is Beautiful illustrates part of this well. In a Nazi concentration camp, a father uses humor, imagination, sacrifice, and love to protect his young son. The camp is not good. The suffering is not good. The evil is not softened by clever storytelling. But the father refuses to let brutality be the only thing his son receives from the world.
The illustration has limits. The father protects his son partly by hiding the full truth from him, which is not a model for adult faith. Christian joy does not survive because Christians fail to see the camp for what it is. Paul and Silas knew exactly where they were sitting.
Still, the film captures something important. Goodness remains possible within terrible circumstances, not because suffering is secretly good, but because love can still act.
Viktor Frankl, who survived Nazi concentration camps, wrote of the human capacity to choose one’s attitude and response even under appalling conditions. His insight should never be used to blame people for their suffering or imply that every person has equal emotional capacity in every circumstance. But it does echo a biblical conviction: evil may be real, but it does not get to dictate every faithful response.
“Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good,” Paul writes (Romans 12:21). Joy can be part of that resistance. Suffering may walk into the room, but it does not get to rearrange all the furniture and declare itself the owner.

So what do we do with “choose joy”?

I would keep the phrase. But I would finish the sentence.
Choose joy in the Lord. Choose where you look and what you hope in. Practice gratitude without pretending that every circumstance is good. Grieve honestly, and grieve toward God rather than away from Him. Ask God to produce in you what you cannot manufacture.
And when joy comes, let it spill into someone else’s life.
Please do not hand the phrase to someone who is drowning. Hand them a casserole. Sit with them. Weep with them. Ecclesiastes says there is “a time to keep silence, and a time to speak” (Ecclesiastes 3:7). There may come a day when the reminder helps. Wisdom is knowing which day it is.
We cannot always choose what happens to us. We cannot always choose what we feel. But we can choose where we look, what we hope in, and whether we add goodness to a dark room or simply more darkness.
The joy of the Lord is not a mask we wear so no one sees the pain. It is a fortress to which we run while the pain is still real. And sometimes, if we are paying attention, we get to hold the door open for someone else.

Sources

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Biblical Distinction Between Holiness and Perfection

The difference between holiness and perfection is often blurred in modern theology, yet both Scripture and classical philosophy treat them as distinct concepts that answer fundamentally different questions. At its core, perfection concerns completeness or fulfillment. In the classical tradition associated with Aristotle and later Aquinas, perfection is teleological, meaning it is end-directed. A thing is perfect when it fully actualizes what it is meant to be. Perfection is therefore comparative and measurable relative to a standard, and it answers a specific question. Is anything missing? A perfect circle lacks none of the properties required to be a circle. A perfect knife fulfills its cutting purpose without deficiency. This understanding aligns closely with the New Testament’s use of the Greek word teleios (τέλειος), which means complete, mature, or brought to its intended end. Jesus uses this term in Matthew 5:48 (NIV), which says, “Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father...

My Thoughts on Guilt

I am looking for counter arguments. The only way I am going to discover the truth is through your ideas. This is a progressing thought, I don't presume to be right. If you are religious substitute God for Nature. In the beginning of my thoughts on guilt, I was looking for its purpose. I believe that all life is balanced everything adds up to zero. Physics has suggested that nothing is created or destroyed. I don’t believe that we have evolved past the principles of Nature and are continually subject to its principles. Being this isn’t a discourse on balance, please read this with the assumption that the previous statement is true. If everything is in balance what is guilt balancing and what is it replacing. Guilt is self induced emotional abuse. When we hurt someone one, we hurt ourselves as penance for doing wrong. We balance the scales by punishing ourselves for our poor behavior. Once the act of guilt has been initiated, we are now justified and blameless until we hurt another. ...

On the Nature of Taste and Whether It Can Be Learned

At some point, most people encounter someone whose sense of style, fashion, or decor feels consistently off. At first, this is easy to dismiss as a matter of preference. Taste is subjective, we tell ourselves. But when poor taste recurs across different contexts, it raises a more unsettling question. What exactly is taste? How does good taste develop? Why do some people seem unable to acquire it? Good taste is often misunderstood as trend awareness or personal expression. In reality, it is something far more restrained and disciplined. Good taste is the ability to recognize proportion, coherence, and intention within a given context. It reflects an understanding of relationships between elements rather than attachment to any single element. People with good taste notice balance, scale, rhythm, and absence. They sense when something is excessive, distracts from its purpose, or draws attention to itself unnecessarily. Most importantly, they adapt their choices to context. What works in o...